I moved stuff from execution sub-package into core and tidied up a bit (especially a cycle in the step/factory implementations).
This might be finished. But, I would like to think a little about packages called "support". There are a couple that seem to fit the name (support classes for the sibling or parent packages), but most are really implementations of interfaces in the parent. Maybe "internal" (I hate "impl")? Or leave them as "support". TBD.
Dave Syer - 09/Mar/08 11:36 AM I moved stuff from execution sub-package into core and tidied up a bit (especially a cycle in the step/factory implementations).
This might be finished. But, I would like to think a little about packages called "support". There are a couple that seem to fit the name (support classes for the sibling or parent packages), but most are really implementations of interfaces in the parent. Maybe "internal" (I hate "impl")? Or leave them as "support". TBD.
Task
Resolved
Blocker
Combine the core and execution modules
This might be finished. But, I would like to think a little about packages called "support". There are a couple that seem to fit the name (support classes for the sibling or parent packages), but most are really implementations of interfaces in the parent. Maybe "internal" (I hate "impl")? Or leave them as "support". TBD.